Home
|
Ecclesiastical asseveration of facts faith and beliefs May 12, 2010, A.D. To the private man Garry Bainbridge acting as an agent of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada. Notice to agents is notice to principals in their private capacity From; minister Timothy-Robert:Debnam Land mass known as Esterhazy Saskatchewan No code non commercial Hello and Greetings in the name of YHWH and our savior Yehushua the anointed. My Christian baptismal name is Timothy Robert and I am of the Debnam family of the geographical location called Esterhazy Saskatchewan and have been told verbally that I came into this land on the 29th Day of January in Nineteen Hundred and 65 A.D. In the Yorkton Hospital also being in the geographical location of Saskatchewan It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that first off I wish you to be aware this is a sincere expression of what I know and believe and in no way is intended to be mischievous intimidating or malicious as it is a true expression of my beliefs and faith. This may, can and shall not be construed by any man or woman herein named as a threat of violence, mental instability or an act of terrorism and may, can and shall be solely construed as an innocent, peaceful and loving notice of the facts presented by me minister of Christ Timothy-Robert:Debnam being a minister of Jesus/Yahushua the Christ.. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the covenant /agreement/contract I am offering herein is for your acceptance of these facts and to bring about your awareness of the schedules you may tacitly agree to be submitting to in complying with your contractual obligations. I as bondservant of Christ wish to make you see and know that if by your negligence of standard of care and fairness you bring stress/harm/damages to man or woman or their property you are privately liable for those damages and are bound by this offer and your response or lack thereof. I say bound by the laws of God Leviticus 6:2-5 and nature as if you bring harm to others by gift of life and right to retain it this is an appropriate method of defence as section 39 of the Canadian criminal code so adequately describes. Ezekiel 33:6-10 It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact Garry that, by my sending you this good faith agreement I do attempt to ascertain all the facts in honour. If you have any reason or proof to suggest or provide to me God’s minister officially performing the functions of my calling, that the following statements of the facts are not true, you are being offered the opportunity to refute these offered facts so as to clear yourself of any assumptive contractual awareness of the truth of such facts. Also be aware this communication of agreement cannot be lawfully inquired of at public or government expense as it is a provable private matter and government funding cannot support private contracts. All legal bills must and shall be paid for out of your private pocket no different than Maurice Duplessis the former Premier and Attorney General of Quebec. http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca/fr/browseSubjects/roncarelli.asp
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that you are privately aware (every time), that I, minister of Christ Timothy-Robert:Debnam am a breathing, flesh and blood creation of the creator God/ YHWH in His image, and through his only begotten son, Jesus/Yahushua the Christ, and that I am as of my faith been ordained by Christ as His minister.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that are aware my intent as a newborn minister of Christ has from the beginning and will stand till I die, in exposing the truth and thereby fulfilling my ministerial duty as watchman as exemplified by Ezekiel 33:6-10. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that my efforts to expose lies, fraud and altered documents are not only in defence of the truth but in defence of my rights and freedoms and officially performing my duties as a bond servant for Jesus Christ! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I have recently been exposed to information that has caused me to strengthen my spiritual connections in exercising my faith and beliefs. As a result of my spiritual awareness and this knowledge I must quest after your awareness and hopefully establish an agreement with you. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I have joined a relatively new and International Church that offers redemption from a false god's system of laws, I wish to know if you have any law that can induce me or intimidate me to violate my faith. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you the private man will get back to me with the information if you have it available, as if it is not lawful for me to follow the laws of God then I need to see by whose authority that I can be intimidated to break them. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that If you have no authority to intimidate me to violate Gods first commandment then you have no authority outside of Gods law as God's first commandment is “Do not bow to false Gods nor serve them” . It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that my understanding of life being brought up with a good moral structure is first to do no harm. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that before you reply I would like you to review some of your own government’s information. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that this is clearly important for you to be aware of before you can grasp the significance of what I am endeavoring to tell you. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that first I would like you to know what the word De facto means so you can see the top of the Canadian pyramid and what source it has for authority
De Facto De facto. [L.]
actually; in fact; existing; as a king de
facto, distinguished from a king de
jure, or by right. DE
FACTO. Actually; in fact; in deed. A
term used to denote a thing actually done. de
facto (dë fak’tö). In fact, as distinguished from “de jure,” by right. de
facto government. A government
wherein all the attributes of sovereignty
have, by usurpation,(see below) been transferred from those who had been legally invested with them to
others, who, sustained by a power above the forms of law, claim to
act and do act in their stead. 30 Am Jur 181. De
facto. In fact; actually;
indeed; in reality. Ridout
v. State, 161 Tenn. 248, 30
S.W.2d 255, 257, 71 A.L.R. 830. De
facto government. One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the
rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in
overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its
own in lieu thereof. Wortham v.
Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 128
S.W.2d 1138, 1145. de
facto (dë fak’tö, da-, de-). [[L]]
existing or being such in actual fact though
not by legal establishment, official recognitiont,
etc. [de facto government]: cf. de jure.
Top of Form Bottom of Form
Usurpation & Usurp USURP’, v. t. s. as z. [Fr. usurper
; L. usurpo.]
USURPATION. The unlawful
assumption of the use of property which belongs to another; an interruption or
the disturbing a man in his right and possession. Tomlins. USURPER. One who assumes
the right of government by force, contrary to and in violation of the
constitution of the country. Toul. Droit. Civ, n. 32. usurp (yöö zurp’, -surp’) vt.
[[ME usurpen
< MFr usurper
< L usurpare
< usus,
a use + rapere,
to seize: see rape]] to take or assume (power, a position, property, rights,
etc.) and hold in possession by force or without right – vi. to
practice or commit usurpation (on or upon) – usurp’er
n.
– usurp’ing|ly adv. usurpation (yöö zer pä’shen, -ser-) n. [[ME usurpacion
< L usuparetio]]
the act of usurping; esp., the unlawful or
violent seizure of a throne, power, etc. USURPA’TION, n. [supra.] USURP’ER, n. USURPATION. The unlawful
assumption of the use of property which belongs to another; an interruption or
the disturbing a man in his right and possession. Tomi.
This a rendition form the Governor Generals web page. Note the use of the word you have just seen the definition of. De facto Here is the World Bank's, being Canada's creditor, definition of de facto. Dealings with De Facto Governments Note:This OP 7.30 replaces OP 7.30, dated November 1994. Questions may be addressed to the Chief Counsel, Operations Policy. 1. A “de facto government” comes into, or remains in, power by means not provided for in the country’s constitution, such as a coup d'etat, revolution, usurpation, abrogation or suspension of the constitution.
· Français · Help · Search · Honours · Heraldry · Media · Visit us · Home Home : Governor General : Role and Responsibilities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defacto is also an excellent source of a definition for the word defacto. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the definition of that one word is a complete demonstration of how a government can act as a false God. I will also refer you to the repealed section 2 of the British North American Act. It says there that the Queens heirs will be bound by and inherit the Act as under their authority. Footnotes to the Constitution Act, 1867 These footnotes are taken from the April 1, 1996 Consolidation of The Constitution Acts 1867 to 1982(1) The Enacting clause was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.). It read as follows: Be it therefore enacted and declared by the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the Authority of the same, as follows: (2) As enacted by the Constitution Act, 1982, which came into force on April 17, 1982. The section, as originally enacted, read as follows: 1. This Act may be cited as The British North America Act, 1867. (3) Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.), read as follows: 2. The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. (4) The first day of July, 1867, was fixed by proclamation dated May 22, 1867. (5) Partially repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.). As originally enacted the section read as follows: 4. The subsequent Provisions of this Act, shall, unless it is otherwise expressed or implied, commence and have effect on and after the Union, that is to say, on and after the Day appointed for the Union taking effect in the Queen's Proclamation; and in the same Provisions, unless it is otherwise expressed or implied, the Name Canada shall be taken to mean Canada as constituted under this Act. (6) Canada now consists of ten provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba, British Columbia Prince Edward Island, Alberta Saskatchewan and Newfoundland) and three territories (the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut).
Statute Law Revision Act, 189356-57 Victoria, c. 14 (U.K.) [Note: Only parts affecting the Constitution Acts are reproduced here.]An Act for further promoting the Revision of the Statute Law by repealing Enactments which have ceased to be in force or have become unnecessary [19th June 1893] Whereas it is expedient that certain enactments, which may be regarded as spent, or have ceased to be in force otherwise than by express specific repeal by Parliament, or have, by lapse of time or otherwise become unnecessary, should be expressly and specifically repealed: Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: 1. The enactments described in the schedule to this Act are hereby repealed, subject to the provisions of this Act and subject to the exceptions and qualifications in the schedule mentioned; and every part of a title, preamble, or recital specified after the words "in part, namely," in connexion with an Act mentioned in the said schedule may be omitted from any revised edition of the statutes published by authority after the passing of this Act, and there may be added in the said edition such brief statement of the Acts, officers, persons, and things mentioned in the title, preamble, or recital, as may in consequence of such omission appear necessary: .......... 4. This Act may be cited as the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893. SCHEDULE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reign and | Title Chapter | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...................................... Constitution Act, 1867. 30 & 31 Victoria In part; namely, c. 3 From "Be it therefore" to "same as follows." Section two. Section four to "provisions" where it last occurs . Section twenty-five. Sections forty-two and forty-three. Section fifty-one. from "of the census" to "seventy-one and" and the word 'subsequent ." Section eighty-one. Section eighty-eight, from "and the House" to the end of the section. Sections eighty-nine and one hundred and twenty-seven. Section one hundred and forty-five. Repealed as to all Her Majesty's Dominions.
I will also offer you who the Supreme law of the Canadian corporation applies to as per Heritage Canada liberal interpretation.
If the Supreme law of the Canadian debtor corporation is over all the subordinate laws and only applies to the government can you tell me how the subordinate laws apply to me when I am not government nor partners with government? I offer my apologies that the writers of this law make it so hard to read but I am not the author of that confusion only my own God given freedoms to not bow to a false god. You with a competent eye can see readily that the government of Canada was usurped and taken over by wealthy international bankers when in January 22nd 1901 at Osborne house on the isle of wight Queen Victoria died. This effectively brought the British North American Act to a Sudden death as of the repeal of Section two that took place in 1893. You have seen above that section 2 that was originally intended to bind her heirs to the enforcement of that enactment. The repeal, as you have read in the Statute law revision act of 1893, was of the consideration of the drafters of that enactment that they no longer needed the Queen or her heirs to continue their plunder and as such you have a de facto unlawful government acting as if they were lawfully in a dejure position of law. This is known as fraud.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I ministerTimothy-Robert:Debnam, do not, accept or present myself to be a commercially active corporation or any form of fictitious legal entity inaccurately referred to as a “person”, meaning mask worn by a player on a stage or a fiction, or that I have ever, with informed consent, allowed or accepted my name to be altered for a financial purpose as it is agreed with no dispute to the fact that I am writing to you as a man to you in your private capacity as a man and most definitely not as a “person”, created by the court, and or corporations and referred to in all of the court documents in all capital letters, as defined in the legal profession’s code of professional conduct as being corporate. i.e.” person" includes a corporation or other legal entity, an association, partnership or other organization, the Crown in right of Canada or a province and the government of a state or any political subdivision thereof. Deuteronomy 1:17;10:17;Acts 10:34;Romans 2:11; James 2:9
My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. 2:2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment; 2:3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: 2:4 Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts? 2:5 Hearken, my beloved brethren, Hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him? 2:6 But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? 2:7 Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by which ye are called? 2:8 If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself, ye do well: 2:9 But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. 2:10 For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. 2:11
Webster’s 1913 DictionaryWebster's 1913 Dictionary Definition: Per"son
\, n. [OE. persone,
persoun,
person, parson, OF.
persone, F. personne, L. persona a mask (used by actors), a
personage, part, a person, fr. personare to sound through;
per + sonare to sound. See {Per-}, and cf. {Parson}.]
A character or part, as in a play; a specific kind or
manifestation of individual character, whether in real
life, or in literary or dramatic representation; an
assumed character. [Archaic]
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that the following is true and accurate and that you agree consent and have no dispute to the facts below and above being true and that a canon of construction of law and a maxim of law 'expressio unius est exclusio alterius' or 'inclusio unius est exclusio alterius' holds that 'to express or include one thing implies the exclusion of another, or of the alternative.'" Rainey, 341 S.C. at 86, 533 S.E.2d at 582 (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 602 (7th ed. 1999)); see Evins v. Richland County Historic Pres. Comm'n, 341 S.C. 15, 19, 532 S.E.2d 876, 878 (2000) “What is not included is excluded” Section 2 of the Criminal Code ensures that corporations can be held criminally liable for an offence since that section defines a 'person' as including corporations:
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that the Latin word persona was originally used to denote the mask worn by an actor. From this it was applied to the role he assumed, and, finally, to any character on the stage of life, to any individual. This article discusses (1) the definition of "person", especially with reference to the doctrine of the Incarnation; and (2) the use of the word persona its Greek equivalents in connection with the Trinitarian disputes. To a person therefore belongs a threefold incommunicability, expressed in notes (b), (c), and (d). The human soul belongs to the nature as a part of it, and is therefore not a person, even when existing separately. The human nature of Christ does not exist per se seorsum, but in alio, in the Divine Personality of the Word. It is therefore communicated by assumption and so is not a person. Lastly the Divine Essence, though subsisting per se, is so communicated to the Three Persons that it does not exist apart from them; it is therefore not a person. Deuteronomy 1:17;10:17;Acts 10:34;Romans 2:11;James 2:9 2Peter 2:3 ; Romans 16:17-20 ;Acts 5:29; Psalms118: Another matter I wish to address is concerning your legal Oath of Allegiance, after much tedious research I have discovered the Oath lawyers swore to her Majesty Queen Elizabeth is in fact altered from the original form and invalid, you do realize that in the Federal oath of allegiance Act it states. 2. (1) Every person who, either of his own accord or in compliance with any lawful requirement made of the person, or in obedience to the directions of any Act or law in force in Canada, except the Constitution Act, 1867 and The Citizenship Act desires to take an oath of Allegiance shall have administered and take the Oath in the following form, and no other:
I,...................., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors. So help me God.
Would you care to see what Oath has be implemented in Canada under the Oath of Office Act I,.................,swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law.* Can you clearly see a difference? I’m sure you realize what this implies, that lawyers for the province being required by law to swear the Oath have taken an Oath contrary to the Federal Oath of Allegiance Act which gives them no authority to advise litigate or draft law to reign over over anyone. That violates section 126 of the C.C.C. You do realize the Queen has taken an Oath to God as well The Coronation Oath: The Queen having returned to her Chair (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the fourth day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen, Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath? And the Queen answering, I am willing, The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows: Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs? Queen: I solemnly promise so to do. Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgments? Queen: I will. Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them? Queen: All this I promise to do. Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the promises: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the Archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words: The things which I have here promised, I will perform, and keep. So help me God. Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath. The Queen having thus taken her Oath, shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster. The Presenting of the Holy BibleWhen the Queen is again seated, the Archbishop shall go to her Chair; and the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, receiving the Bible from the Dean of Westminster, shall bring it to the Queen and present it to her, the Archbishop saying these words: Our gracious Queen: to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes, we present you with this Book, the most valuable thing that this world affords. And the Moderator shall continue: Here is Wisdom; This is the royal Law; These are the lively Oracles of God. Then shall the Queen deliver back the Bible to the Moderator, who shall bring it to the Dean of Westminster, to be reverently placed upon the Altar. This done, the Archbishop shall return to the Altar. I sure do hope that you have read this very carefully, this is prima fascia proof. The Queen is to up hold the Laws of the Bible as God’s Laws are supreme The acts herein cited below are for the reference of this court and or ministry and are the bona fide words of the law with the parliament;
Be it hereby enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows;
The Queen says she gets advice from and with the consent of the Lords Spiritual.
a) CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 states in the preamble: “Whereas Canada is founded upon the principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Therefore Canada recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law, being God’s law as the supreme Law, as found in the King James Bible.
Usury
b) Exodus 22:25 – “If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.”
Leviticus 23:1-3 – (1) “You shall not spread a false report .You shall not join hands with the wicked to act as malicious witness. (2) You shall not follow a majority in wrong doing; when you bear witness in a law suit, you shall not side with the majority so as to pervert justice; nor shall you be partial to the poor in lawsuit.”
Leviticus 25:17, 36, 37 – (17) “Ye shall not therefore oppress one another; but thou shalt fear thy God: for I am the Lord your God. (36) Take thou no usery of him, or increase: but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. (37) Thou shall not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.”
Deuteronomy 23:19 – “Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother, usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury.”
Nehemiah 5:7 – “Then I consulted with myself and rebuked the nobles, and the rulers and, said unto them, Ye exact usury, every one of his brother. And I set a great assembly against them.”
Nehemiah 5:10 – “I likewise, and my brethren, and my servants, might exact of them money and corn: I pray you, let us leave off this usury.”
The Queen gets advise from the Lords Spiritual and Canada recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law.
c) The Queen of England is the head of the Church of England Head of the state of Canada and defender of the faith. In approving all the laws in Canada in principle the Queen gets her advice and consent from the Lords spiritual.
Therefore the Queen in defense of the faith cannot commit blasphemy by admitting that mans law is precedenential and supercedent to Gods law contrary to the command of Deuteronomy.
d) Deuteronomy 4:1 “Now therefore hearken, O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgments, which I teach you, for to do [them], that ye may live, and go in and possess the land which the LORD God of your fathers giveth you.”
4:2 “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.”
12:32 “What thing so ever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it.” It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that if you fail to produce your lawful oath of allegiance, you admit by default that you do not have a lawful oath of allegiance, are running de-facto, have no legitimate power what so ever and usurped her majesty’s power and sanction and have done so via fraud as the present oath of office act indicates in Saskatchewan that the Saskatchewan oath of allegiance is indeed deficient and is a violation of section 126 of the Canadian Criminal Code, which would indicate that the federal oaths of allegiance act is the act in question being violated. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that no one has any authority to intimidate a man or woman to do a thing they have religious freedom not to do like associating with the dead, allowing their name to be altered or a financial purpose, bowing to a provable false god or submitting to the provincial codes and rules of a dead in law legal fiction trading on the stock exchange as a business for profit in violation of God's command of Exodus 20:3-5 and Christs direction of Matthew 6:24 It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that my exercising of my faith may conflict with your monetary policies that in fact are not law but corporate rules so by this agreement I am ensuring no false assumptions or process may be engaged in obstructing me or intimidating me from having the ability to practice my faith harmless from reproach. So please get back to me with the information if you have it available, as if it is not lawful for me to follow the laws of God then I need to see by whose authority that I can be intimidated to break them. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that if you have no authority to intimidate me to violate Gods first commandment then you have no authority outside of Gods law as God's first commandment is “Do not bow to false Gods nor serve them”. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that this letter of Christian faith is to let you know as a man of God that I, minister Timothy-Robert:Debnam am of the Christian faith, belief and ministry and hold the King James Bible as the supreme rule of law and God's word. I intend no discrimination of your own faith by this letter but would ensure my own defense against discrimination by such truthful and open communication.
Public servant refusing
to deliver property
It is my belief and faith that the Queen in all commonwealth countries is the defender of the faith head of the Church of England and head of the state. She is exactly like the biblical figure Melchizadek who was high priest and King in one body. The constitutions of the commonwealth countries all start off saying the Queen got advise and consent from the Lords Spiritual and the preamble says God is Supreme and the rule of law.
Now the Queen as head of the church and defender of the faith cannot commit blasphemy in saying mans law is precedential and supercedent to God’s law as in the command of Deuteronomy 4:1-2; 12:32, to not add to or take away from God’s law is clear.
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I minister of Christ Timothy-Robert:Debnam do hereby aver that the Holy King James Bible has official standing in all courts of Saskatchewan and is the rule of law so stated in the preamble to the Canadian Bill of Rights and Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Sections of the latter along with all subordinate law also including the criminal code which only apply to Her Majesty’s agents as per section 32 of the Charter that I make no use of but bring it to your attention that it applies to you acting in a de facto corporate capacity. Ezekiel 33:6
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the listings below are only a portion of the discrimination, harassment and intimidation I have experienced over the past 10 years due to union misrepresentation!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 has aided and abetted a fraud upon me with regards to allowing the company’s unlawful lawyer to produce a fraudulent ROE stating that I was terminated in the year 2002 that intended to damage me the man before the arbitrator.! This taking place at the arbitration hearing, on December 10, and 11 of 2008 A.D, It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council allowed Dynatecs lawyer to unsuccessfully harass and badger me on the stand at the arbitration hearing regarding this false record of employment! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council should have immediately came to my aid and should have advised the arbitrator of the unlawful document (ROE). It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council along with the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 along with the private man Bob Pelton acting as labour arbitrator(allowed the companies lawyer (to retract the unlawful document (false record of employment) with no objection after she was caught in her deception,.(as per Blacks law dictionary 1980 and the Canadian Criminal Code of Canada aid and abet is defined as “to assist or help in the commission of a crime. Comprehends all assistance rendered by words, acts, encouragements or presence, actual, immediate or not, or constructive, to render assistance if necessary.”) It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council and I had a meeting before the arbitration hearing, at this meeting you informed me at that time that I could not bring any of my own documents to present at the arbitration hearing. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact Garry that yourself and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 and had all the evidence and numerous documents to submit on my behalf at the arbitration hearing and failed to do so because you and they were compromised by your/their past actions against me the man! It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council along with the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as national rep for CEP local 890 have failed to honorably adequately represent my issues prior to and including the arbitration hearing in December 2008 and because of this and they brought great stress and anxiety upon me and my family by their intentional attempt to defraud me of my allot able monies! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that engagement of the unlawful actions from you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890, unjustly affected the arbitration process and was not only counterproductive but only imperiled any fair reasonable outcome to my situation. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National rep For CEP local 890 have failed to adequately represent me from the year 2000 until present date and that I did not obtain from them or you a dedicated effort to resolve my past and present problems regarding my issues as the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National rep For CEP local 890 were collusive with Dynatec management to illegally terminate my employment and had openly expressed to the union members that I was draining their expense fund. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council in joint effort with the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National rep for CEP local 890 have been conscious participants, both actively and passively in suppression of my rights for the past many years, up to and including the arbitration hearing and to present date. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council knew that at the arbitration hearing that (under oath) the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890), falsely claimed that when I returned to work in 2000 after sustaining a back injury, I was placed in the phone shack as “light duty It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council was aware that this claim of returning to light duty by union president Phil Polsom was a blatant lie and is in total contradiction to what he had previously claimed in a letter to the WCB dated April 3, 2003 that you were in possession of.. In this letter from the union president Phil Polsom it states that; (quote) “He (Tim) was subjected to undo stress because while others opted for the position they also had the ability to get out any time they wanted. Tim on the other hand, was placed in the phone shack as punishment for getting hurt, with no chance of joining the workforce outside of his position even though he repeatedly let the company know that he could not take the pressure of this new position. He at no time had the ability to get out even for one shift. While the company knew that this position did not work for Tim, and that he was seeking medical help to try and deal with this, they continued to force him into this position and did nothing to accommodate him in any other way. Tim has demonstrated that he has tried to seek medical help in dealing with the stress he felt with this position. The Company continued to place this stress on him by ignoring complaints and concerns that he had. Example; IMC employees not checking in at the shack and driving into work areas when he was trying to clear people for blasting. We believe that these circumstances have led to a situation that has become unbearable for Tim to handle and caused him to be off work. The Company has done nothing to try to accommodate or ease the stress for Tim to allow him to come back to work” (unquote) It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man acting as president of CEP local 890 Phil Polsom and the private man Walter Manning acting as CEP Local 890 National Rep have discriminated and intimidated and misrepresented me from the year 2000 until present date! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that in the year 2000 Dynatec had failed to lead a single stitch of evidence as to serious or unacceptable risks to safety as a result of accommodating me and the private man acting as president of CEP local 890 Phil Polsom and the private man Walter Manning acting as CEP Local 890 National Rep failed to file a grievance for me.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that even when presented with the evidence in 2000 the fact that the private man acting as president of CEP local 890 Phil Polsom and the private man Walter Manning acting as CEP Local 890 National Rep failed to act on my behalf and continued to allow the Company to harass and intimidate me and would not file a grievance! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that in 2000/2002 the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and I worked on the same crew and he was fully aware of my decline in health resulting from the Company’s baseless work reassignment yet failed to file a grievance. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that in 2000/2002 the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 did nothing to assist me even though the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 was in agreement with me that the reinstatement was a stratagem to induce me to resign! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that in the year 2000/2002 the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 should have demanded substantiation of this scurrilous charge of me the man being unsafe worker and filed a grievance to rectify the company’s discriminatory behavior. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that had the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 conducted themselves properly, they would have informed me of the transgression of my rights in 2000 when the labour board had brought it to the company’s attention and filed grievance forthwith. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that had the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 filed a grievance for me the man it would have forestalled my subsequent psychological maladjustment resulting from Management's unfair and punitive treatment of me the man! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that because of the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 misrepresentation and failure to act on my behalf I was forced to remain in the phone shack until my psychological breakdown in 2002. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 shares full responsibility with Dynatec for failing to represent me and allowing the company to harass and discriminate against me the man. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that because the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 failed to represent me in 2000/2002 by failing to file a grievance against the company’s discriminatory behavior against me the man, the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 shares responsibility for the fact that I spent the next 2 years fighting for WCB benefits and having to go on welfare to support my family! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that, the private man Phil Polsom acting union president and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 knew my case had merit for a grievance but allowed me to fight through the WCB for 2 and half years instead of representing me and filing a grievance! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that in the Year 2004, the private man Phil. Polsom acting union president was further duplicitous when he falsely stated to a workers advocate Ms. Cathy Mclean who represented me, that the Union had no explanation for my work reassignment but that the union suspected an attempt to force me out of Dynatec employment. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 failed to provide information pertaining to my safety record to Cathy Mclean the workers advocate that she requested in 2004! (memo note from wcb file.) It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that In a memorandum from my appeal in 2004 from WCB .B. Taylor Director of Board Services, it says (quote) " Again, Mr. Polsom indicated that there were other positions that they could have put the worker in that would have been more in tune with his past experience such as tool crib man and would have removed him from the risks that the employer expressed concern about.(unquote).
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 has steadfastly refused to honestly try and represent me, and It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact it is quite clear from the evidence that Dynatec AND THE UNION simply wished I the man would just go away. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that, the private man Phil. Polsom acting union president mislead me and informed me that he did file a grievance on my behalf in 2005 for Dynatecs failure to return me to work. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil. Polsom acting union president continued to lie about filing the grievance until I learned the truth of the matter in the year 2007!! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that it would have been incumbent upon the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 in 2005 to force Dynatec to present documented evidence of their accommodation of my return to work and not accept at face value the employer’s allegation of unsuitability.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 claim accommodating me would not have affected anything in the collective agreement yet they failed for years to fairly represent me the man and my family and I suffered for it!. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council along with the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 had numerous opportunities to contest by way of grievance the company’s obstructive actions towards me the man in refusing me opportunity to reassume work activity and failed to do so and my family and I suffered for it! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that for years the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 were content to sit back and do nothing but mislead and lie to me the man and because of this blatant misrepresentation I and my family suffered for it!! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 used the Human Rights charges against the employer as a “red herring” since October 2006 and never really proceeded on my behalf! Below find the minutes from a U/M meeting. (Grievence) It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that this email dated November 7, 2007 from Phil Polsom is directly conflicting to the grievance the Union filed in June 2007, where the union states quote " the Union is currently contesting on your behalf the employer’s failure to return you to work in a timely fashion in early 2007. The complaint by the Union necessarily raises human rights issues, because the basis was due solely to your medical condition, which is a breach of applicable human rights provisions". Unquote.
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 12:58 PM Subject: Minutes from November 16 meeting
Tim Debnam
As per your phone message, I am forwarding you a copy of the notes that were taken from the U/M meeting of Nov. 16th 2007 pertaining to your claim. Should you have any further questions please feel free to contact us but keep in mind we will require any further requests be made in writing.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890
These are the notes copied directly from the minutes and pasted here for you.
Tim Debnam’s grievance was discussed briefly. The Company advised the Union that they wish to proceed in resolving both the Human Rights claim and grievance together. The union stated that it has not been involved with the Human Rights complaint and therefore the Union would be proceeding with the grievance up to and including arbitration if warranted. The Company at this time is seeking legal opinion pertaining to both the Human Rights Claim and grievance.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 would pursue this avenue of filling human rights charges as early as 2006 but subsequent events demonstrated that there was little genuine interest on the Unions part to thus proceed, forcing me the man to the conclusion that I would undertake this submission on my own behalf. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 also informed the WCB that he was helping me submit a human rights case against the company in 2006, all the while he had already mislead me and had informed me that charges had already been laid against Dynatec for their punitive discriminatory treatment of me the man! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that on November 2, 2006 that I contacted the SHRC to inquire how my case was proceeding, it was at that time I was informed that there was no case filed on my behalf from the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and thaT the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 had lied to me all that time! Here is the unedited email sent to the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 I contacted human rights by phone today to find out whats happening. I was told that they had no file on me and I should try and get a hold of you to see whats happening yours truly Tim Debnam. As mentioned this was sent November 2, 2006!
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 once again misrepresented me the man when he failed to file a grievance for me the man in 2006, when on December 12, 2006 the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary lied and stated that they never received any medical documentation from the Sask. WCB regarding my limitations and restrictions and because of this they were requiring per their collective agreement that I have an Independent Psychological Assessment completed.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 in 2005 had the information to prove Hughes statements as false and had all the documents to file a grievance and failed to do so!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the reasons there were delays in 2007 was because the employer and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 and decided they needed fresh information.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 and the Employer HAD that information in 2005 AND IGNORED IT!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 and the employer and can hardly deny an accommodation, and then close to two years later, seek to blame me the man because the information the employer and the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 had ignored was now stale- dated!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that at the arbitration hearing Mr. Hughes of Dynatec committed perjury on the stand when he stated that he did not receive the 2005 RTW plan.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that finally, and most importantly, the employers’ eventual accommodation for me in 2007 doing the exact same work I would have done if I would have been accommodated in 2005 proves that I was not a safety risk and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 should have filed a grievance for me the man in the year 2005!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the union knew all along that I was to be returned to work in 2005 and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 did nothing to help me the man, proffering the poor excuse at arbitration that they were in active discussions with the company from early 2006!!
Email to union lawyer; Hi Garry, according to Dynatecs background information they are saying I have been off work for the past 5 years because of chronic stress disorder. This is untrue. I was cleared to r.t.w. in November 2005 by w.c.b. multi disciplinary assessment, where I saw a psychiatrist, psycholigist, and a medical doctor . I have continued seeing Dr. Robertson since Nov. 2005 due to the emotional stress as well as the financial stress Dynatec is putting me through. I don’t see how I could possible sign a return to work plan employer/employee agreement that states such a lie. Yours truly Tim Debnam
Email from National rep of union Walter manning confirming to Dynatecs Joan Duchek that I should have been returned to work in 2005! Hi Joan,
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 and Dynatec HAD that information in 2005 AND IGNORED IT! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 had communications with WCB in early January 2006 and informed the WCB that the union was not against vocational training! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 did not disagree or file a grievance for me the man when the WCB claimed in January 2006 that the employer had NO duty to accommodate me!! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that these discriminatory actions by you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council and private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 actions have been callous and punitive against me the man! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that a meeting took place prior to my seeing Dr. Val Mary Harding in 2007 between the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president and the private man Brad Carrigan acting as Dynatecs General manager for Canada, where it was agreed upon that if Dr. Harding said I was able to return to work I could return immediately. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I advised the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 that Dr Val Harding had informed me the man that she had received a letter from Dynatecs Tony Hughes that was four pages long, not double spaced, that was defamatory in nature about my mental and physical health to try and influence her decision on returning me to work.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that after the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 had assured me that this assessment would be independent – as the employer suggested, the employer then became heavily involved in “back channel” communications with the physician, providing wholly improper information and opinion.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I informed the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 of this deflamatory letter on March 28 2007A.D.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that Dr Harding advised me that I needed to get the private man Phil Polsom acting as union president for CEP local 890 to get a copy of this letter from Dynatec since it was to be an open and shared assessment between the Union and Dynatec.
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the employer’s Tony Hughes actions in seeking to influence the outcome of the independent medical assessment clearly shows that the employer was doing everything in their power to keep me the man away from the workplace.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 informed me that the union was no longer interested in the defamatory letter and if I wanted it I would have to get it on my own! Email from Phil Polsom union president: Mr. Debnam
I have done everything that I possibly can to keep you informed of all that is happening regarding your case. I want to make it once again very clear to you that we are moving in an expedited manner with your case but please do not lose sight of the fact that the Union owns the grievance and will proceed in that manner. As I said in our conversation, I will set up a meeting with you as soon as we have met next week and we will see where we stand. I further want to make sure you understand that this local is dealing with only the back wage issue for you and not the letter from the privacy commission or the charges you have filed through the commission. I have made it very clear to you from the start that my first priority was to get you back to work which we were successful in doing and then to get the back wage dealt with. I understand your impatience in this and that you are desperately anxious to get this settled. The Union feels the same way and we are working diligently on your behalf. Once again I must ask you to have patience and allow the system to work. This is a very serious and complex case and does not need to be mishandled simply for the purpose of expediency. I will be in contact with you by the end of next week to update you on the status.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 and you Garry the private man acting as the union’s council was well aware of the financial depravation and mental anguish that persisted against me the man as a direct result of unending Company obfuscation, delay of process and harassment and still the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 was content to sit back and allow this treatment of me the man to continue!
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that not only did the employer not tell me that they were doing this, they repeatedly refused to provide the letter until forced to by the Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner and the union refused to help me the man! It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Brad Carrigan of Dynatec, under oath, at the arbitration hearing on December 2008 A.D. confirmed my testimony that it was agreed with the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president that I could return to work immediately if the Doctor the employer choose said I was able to. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that Brad Carrigans testimony under oath at the arbitration hearing proved that there was a conspiracy to keep me away from the worksite with the Esterhazy onsite management (now Procon management)!! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that my financial stresses mounted at the end of February 2007 when my WCB benefits were terminated and the employer still refused to permit me to return because of the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president the continued misrepresentation and failure to file a grievance for me the man. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that because the union failed to file a grievance until June 2007 all the while knowing that my wcb ran out in February 2007 and because of the unions and WCB failure to represent me and their blatant discrimination towards me, I was once again left with no income and my family and I suffered because of it! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that Dr, Robertson sent a letter to Dr. Harding on April 25, 2007 stating” My opinion of Mr. Debnam’s preparedness to return to work has not changed, in fact I believe his inability to return to the worksite at this point, is causing him considerable emotional stress as well as financial stress unquote.”
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president refused to file a grievance for me! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that even though the Dr. of the companies choosing said I was able to return to full time duties on April 30, 2007 Dynatec would not allow me to return to work, until September 4, 2007 all the while knowing I had NO income from February, 2007 and my family and I suffered because of it! It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that once again the union failed to file a grievance on my behalf in April 2007, when the assessment was completed!!. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that Because of the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president misrepresentation I had to make emergency withdrawals from my RRSP, adding stress to a worsening situation.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that this increased stress was attributable to the failure and the refusal on the part of the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president to accommodate and or represent me the man!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I presented the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 with a letter dated May 11, 2007 from Dr. Val Mary Harding (who preformed the assessment) stating I could resume full-time duties at my current place of employment! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president sat back and did nothing for another entire month! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as CEP local 890 union president falsely informed the private man Walter Manning acting as CEP Local 890 National Rep that I the man accepted a $50,000 settlement offer in lei of employment! June 2007 (emails below) From: CEP Local 890 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 5:31 PM Subject: Re: to walter manning july 17/07 letter
Hi Tim
I apologize for not getting back to you sooner but I am just back from holidays and trying to get things sorted out. You have requested that we respond to you in writing so where possible I will accommodate that request as best as possible. I have gone over with Walter the status of your case and he informed me this morning that he and Brad are trying to connect to discuss getting this in gear and doing it asap. Walter has informed me that he will be in touch with me by Monday with more info so when that happens he or I will be in touch with you to let you know. You have my assurances we are moving as expeditiously as possible on your case and that it is receiving top priority as we want this settled as soon as possible. We will be in touch early next week. Thank you for your continued patience in this matter.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890 ----- Original Message ----- From: tim debnam Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 3:21 PM Subject: RE: to walter manning july 17/07 letter
July 20, 2007 To Phil Polsom, CEP Local 890, Walter Manning, Dear Walter; In response to your letter dated July 17, 2007It was never my intention at any time to usurp the Unions authority, nor to waive my membership in it: im perplexed how my intentions would have been so construed. Rest assured that I am firmly committed to membership in CEPU and representation by them. My intent in requesting written communication was to avoid any future confusion over the origin or substance of any proposal from Dynatec forwarded to me by my union representation and my response to any such offer. It was precisely because of the confusion surrounding my verbal rejection of Dynatecs $50,000 settlement tender that i wished to forestall any future misunderstandings by having all future communications presented in writing. I fully intend to hold myself to this standard and will respond to all formal Union submissions by letter. To what degree does the Union wish to interject on my behalf with Dynatec? We both agree that the union is my sole representation, so should not all company originated communication regarding my case, verbal or otherwise, proceed through the Union? Please clarify so I can appropriately respond should they contact me directly. I ardently desire to return to work and am pleased that my Union is similarly motivated. Yours Truly, Tim Debnam P It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I adamantly denied any acceptance of any in lei of settlement and when stated these facts to the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 he intimidated and threatened me that if I did not accept this in lei offer that I was to show up for work in the following morning (this being July 3, 2007) with only 8 hours notice or be terminated! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, was well aware that my return to work plan advised 2 weeks notice to prepare myself to return to the worksite after so many years of being unlawfully denied access to the workplace! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 was further untruthful when at arbitration he sided with the company and claimed that he was not aware that I required a RTW plan in 2007!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 t was in fact in possession of the documents stating that I was to be accommodated when I returned to work in 2007 with a graduated RTW plan! Here is the email to union president about the RTW plan; Phil i was in to see DR. Robertson yesterday and singed a new release of information form, also got a current back to work plan sent to doctor Harding. Here is Dr. Robertsons phone and e mail address, she said for you to contact her if you need to speak with her. Phone= 786-0578 e mail= gayleen.robertson@shr.sk.ca fax= 306-786-0556 This email was sent to union president on 4/4/2007.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary was discriminating against me the man by not allowing me to return to work when I reported to work on July 3, 2007!
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that under threat duress and intimidation I showed up for work on July 3, 2007 and no one from the union showed up on my behalf to represent me!!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the discrimination against me the man continued as I was informed by the private man Richard Boyd acting as project superintendent Dynatec and private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary from Dynatec that they had no knowledge of me requiring a return to work plan, this being a blatant lie!
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I immediately called my doctor from the mine site who confirmed my statements (July 3, 2007 letter to Joan Duchek from Doctor) even so they sent me home!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Richard Boyd acting as project superintendent Dynatec and the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary from Dynatec lied and claimed that they were not aware that I required a RTW plan, which was a blatant lie as it was incorporated into the assessment concluded in 2007, and the union had this information and failed to show up to represent me!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that on August 10, 2007 the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary contacted the WCB via telephone and asked what duty to accommodate the employer had in accommodating me back to work and WCB said that Dynatec was asked if they could accommodate me back to work within restrictions in 2005.
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary informed the board that they could not accommodate me the man in 2005 and could not accommodate me the man in 2007.(memo note from WCB file)
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that he private woman Joan Duchek was in fact conspiring to keep me away from the worksite with other on site management employees (as confirmed under oath at the arbitration hearing in December 2008 from Brad Carrigans testimony), by informing the WCB that they could not accommodate me once again in 2007!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that on August 13, 2007, the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 phoned me and informed me the man that he the private man Phil Polsom, had e-mail conversations with the private man Brad Carrigan acting as Dynatec General Manager Canada, who had decided that I did not have to sign the last chance agreement form from the employer, just show up for work the next day.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 misrepresented me once again when on August 14, 2007, when I the man reported for work as instructed to by private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890, the private man Richard Boyd from Dynatec asked me if I signed the last chance agreement form.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I the man informed the private man Richard Boyd from Dynatec that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 told me that he had conversations via email with the private man Brad Carrigan acting as Dynatec General Manager Canada who agreed with the union president that I the man didn’t have to sign it!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Richard Boyd acting as project superintendent for Dynatec and the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary told me the man that “they (Dynatec) had reconsidered, and intimidated me stating if I the man didn’t sign the form that Dynatec was done with me, Richard said “you were offered a buyout, there is talk of human rights and that you have a lawyer, Dynatecs Richard Boyd informed me that I could not return to work unless I signed it. I refused and was subsequently sent home once again.
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that At no time did any union representation show up on my behalf full knowing that the company has been conspiring to keep me from the work site for years! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that when I finally permitted to return to work on September 4, 2007 with the Doctors requested GRTW plan, I was returned at a Leaders rate of pay and then when I completed my graduated RTW plan in October 2007 with no justification and the private woman Joan Duchek acting as Dynatec Human Resources secretary demoted me to a miner 2 rate of pay and the union failed to file a grievance for me! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 was allowing this continued intimidation and harassment of me the man to continue!!!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that On December 14, 2007 I was threatened to be terminated and the union failed once again to file a grievance. (email December 19, 2007) December 19, 2007. Phil, on December 17, 2007 Candice Bellegarde, my substitute mental health counselor, called my home with information that Dynatecs Human Resources manager Joan Duchek had phoned to make inquiry regarding my absence from work the afternoon of December 14 2007. Preliminarily, Duchek requested that Ms. Bellegrade verify her signature on the confirmation card she had signed confirming my attendance at the counseling session. Duchek then twice asked for confidential information from Ms. Bellegrade who rebuffed her each time, explaining the impropriety of asking for patient confidential information. On December 17 2007 while at work, foreman R Cranford informed me that I was obliged to immediately attend a company meeting. I did so and was attended by a union shop steward E Dutson. Representing management were R Boyd, J Duckek, G Moore and R Cranford. Mr Boyd alleged that I was in breach of policy for failing to apply in advance for leave to my aforementioned mental health session and that I could be disciplined up to an including termination for this transgression. I responded that Management was fully informed of the requirements of the recommendations set out in the psychological assessment, stating that I have two sessions twice a month for six months to conclude treatment, and that these sessions were integral to work re- introduction and that it was not always possible to anticipate in advance when they would be most needed and hence, productive, from a mental health perspective. I present this as further evidence of ongoing, persistent intimidation by management. They convened a meeting heavily weighted with company officials with the intent of harassment and issued an unwarranted and excessive threat of dismissal. Their actions continue to constitute egregious attacks upon my person and exacerbate and contribute to the stress I experience daily as a result of management misconduct. I would also at this time request from the union my entire file. This should include all correspondence with Dynatec, Val Harding, all grievances filed on my behalf and when and any other correspondence about my case. I understand this may take some time to copy and understand due process. Than you. Brother Tim. Email to Union President January 2008; Phil. Prior to your email of Jan 15th 2008, the most charitable interpretation of your failure to respond to my previous inquiries regarding wage arrears arbitration would be discourtesy. Upon reading this email, even discourtesy must be discounted. In previous emails you have induced me to inquire of yourself and the Union of any information pertinent to my case: now you not only fail to provide specific information when requested but I am informed in insulting tenor that you will quote:” have to bring you up to speed on how the local runs" and that my back pay issue is "in the hands of the lawyers" unquote. This is purposely vague, uninformative, non-representative and wholly contradicts the invitation in your email dated Dec 13 2007, where you stated, quote: "should you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact us" unquote. It is a serious accusation to charge me with threatening yourself or the Union. Since all our communications are in writing please demonstrate in what communiqué' I have produced this reputed coercion. If you cannot so delineate any threats I expect a prompt and full apology from you. In regards to my absences required for mental health counseling, I have in hand a singed authorization from the Company authorizing two absences during the month of January, with no specified dates for which the counseling is to occur. Those dates are to be filled in by myself when opportune and, of course, the Company must be informed when the requisite dates are established. I would interpret this as a rather unfettered application of absenteeism policy which underscores the overreaction by Management to my requested absence of last month, whereupon I was threatened with termination. The union should be cognizant of the double standard applied in this case and intervening on my behalf, not chastising me that I am, quote " no different than anyone else." Unquote Brother Tim Debnam
(November 28 2007. MS Laurena Daniels. It has come to my attention that the company has in place a plan for my forced expulsion from their employment. My information is, specifically, that they have charged a foreman; of whose name I am informed, to affect my dismissal by virtue of the three strikes rule. Reputedly, this gentleman has been instructed to find any and every infraction or transgression of Dynatecs directives to eliminate me from the company roster. This type of targeting is, discriminatory, and prohibited by law. I am fully cognizant that the information of which I am in receipt and which I present here is of hearsay character and that it could be construed without merit. But I fully respect and trust the source of this information, who retains a intimate relationship with Management. I bring this to your attention to alert human rights to the potential transgression of my lawful rights and heighten their awareness in my regard to unfair and illegal acts by management. Yours Truly, Tim Debnam)
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that on February 9, 2007 Company presented me with AWOL notice witch was nothing more than a continuance of their deliberate harassment and the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 continued misrepresentation of my interests. (Email February 9, 2007) February 9, 2008 Phil, The Company has presented me with an AWOL notice, pertinent to Thursday last January 31,2008. Here are the particulars of the event leading to the notice. On the morning in question my vehicle would not start. I immediately telephoned the mine, at approximately 5:30 AM to inform Dean Duchek that I had no transportation and would not be able to attend work that day,. I also stated to Mr Duchek that if I could get my vehicle going in good time I would come in. On February 8, 2008 I was presented with the notice and informed that I would be relived of duties for the shift and sent home without compensation. Greg Moore had produced the AWOL. The conditions of enforcing this policy require two AWOLs within eighteen months before imposition of a non-compensatory day, conditions that were not extant. Firstly, I have not had a previous day entailing failure to report that would justify the issuance of an AWOL notice and secondly, I was not in transgression of the requirement to provide notice on the day in question since I did contact the mine at first opportunity. Is my Union aware of this undeserved notice and if so, what action is it prepared to take on my behalf? Brother Tim Debnam
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that on March 11, was harassed and sent home by company when reported for night shift, told to report next morning for a meeting with management.( Email to union march 11, 2008; March 12, 2008 Dear Mr. Polsom This is to advise my Union that I was subsequently sent home from work tonight when i reported for night shift. I was informed via Jerry Stelmachuck that I was not allowed to work tonight and that I would have to return at 6am tomorrow to have a meeting with managements Richard Boyd. When I inquired as to why I was being sent home, Jerry and foreman Dean Duchek informed me that they did not know the reason why. Was the Union aware of this meeting? What is my Union prepared to do about this ongoing harassment by Dynatec? Yours Truly, Brother Tim Debnam)
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that because of the continued misrepresentation from the private man Phil Polsom acting as president of CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, and the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president who did nothing to stop the continued intimidation and harassment towards me I had to be taken off work once again from my Doctor due to stress in march 2008! Email from me to union president March 12, 2008;
(On march 11th, 2008 I reported for March 11th nightshift, only to be refused work opportunity and sent home by foremen Dean Duchek and Jerry Stelmenchuk. Upon inquiries as to explanation for this dismissal they responded that they were not in possession of any knowledge in this regard but were instructed to inform mr to report to Dynatec Project Superintendent Richard Boyd at 6:00 AM the following morning, when the rationalization would be discussed.
I reported for the meeting as instructed. Attending for management were Richard Boyd, human resource manager Joan Duchek, Foreman Dean Duchek, Greg Moore and safety coordinator Erin Elmy. My union representative present was shop steward Ernie Dutson.
Mr Duston queried of Mr. Boyd the reason for the previous evening’s dismissal. He was informed that the root cause was management’s intention to challenge a previous absence I had incurred as a Lost Time Accident. When Mr. Dutson inquired how that would have any affect my opportunity to complete the previous shift, Mr. Boyd answered Quote: “because I didn’t want him here!” unquote. I asked why management hadn’t scheduled a meeting during the previous dayshift to preclude dismissing me on the subsequent night shift and Mr. Boyd replied that he had QUOTE” Better things to do with my time and I am asking the questions not you!” UNQUOTE Mr. Boyd then directed me to return home and that I would receive further instructions when to return to work. Upon further probing he did instruct me to return to work on the evening of March 12, 2008, night shift.
Following is the casual circumstances that invoked management’s assessment of a lost time accident. On March 3, 2008 while working at the mine, I hurt my wrist. This occurrence was an aggravation of a previously engendered work related injury that I had reported one month preceding to Foreman Robert Cranford. At that time Mr. Cranford had instructed me to reduce stress on the injury and had assigned fellow worker Deanna Petratchack to assist me with lifting cement bags. On Tuesday March 4, I communicated with Dynatec to inform them that I was obliged to miss work and attend a physician for this injury, which was causing severe pain and immobility of the affected wrist. The consulted physician instructed me to take time off work and to rest the injury for the balance of my work period, some three days(seven days total including my scheduled time off.) I phoned Dynatec that same day to inform them of the prescribed need for rest and was in contact with Jhonathan Churney who stated his intention to pass on the information to managements Joan Duchek. Mrs. Duchek requested on March 05 a copy of my doctors instruction which I immediately faxed her.to my person: they take every opportunity to assail me through intimidating, nefarious and spurious tactics. Management may be well within their right to challenge my previous absence as injury related but that does not give them the right to summarily dismiss me from my position without pay. I therefore insist that I be compensated fully at requisite wage for the aforementioned lost shift.’’ Unquote
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that theses were not simple mistakes made by the employer or the private men Phil Polsom, Walter Manning, and Myles Hack acting as my sole union representation, It was not a single incident, It was not a delay of a few weeks, it was a delay in years!
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that from the year 2005 until September 4, 2007 there were repeated refusals with no justification; no attempt to reach a solution, and a denial of access to the workplace for close to two years and numerous acts of misrepresentation by the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president to accommodate and or represent me the man!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that from the evidence presented you the private man can see that the psychological harassment from the employer and the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president only accelerated once I was returned to the worksite in 2007 up to a point where I the man was unable to cope with the stress and was advised by medical professionals to once again be removed from work on March 12, 2008.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the employer and the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president were fully aware that I suffered with a stress condition and they did not have the right to deliberately treat me badly, intimidate, harass, and misrepresent me!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that due to the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president punitive, arrogant and cavalier treatment of my situation and their failure to file yet another grievance for me the man in March 2008, I was once again off work and denied WCB benefits from March 12, 2008 until I won my appeal in the fall of 2009!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president outward misrepresentation of failing to file a grievance for me once again in 2008 is precisely what you the private man Garry would expect from a union that has failed on numerous occasions to adequately represent me the man.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president choices regarding me the man were tainted with self-interest, since they recognize themselves to be compromised by their past actions against me the man,
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president was obviously in agreement that I was being harassed in 2008 if they were encouraging me to appeal the wcb denial of benefits and yet once again the union president Phil Polsom failed to file a grievance for me! Email from union president; Mr Debnam
While the Union is not in agreement with regards to some of your contentions in this letter we do agree you have the right to appeal the decision of WCB to and encourage you to do so. Should you require any assistance please contact us.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that when I the man attempted to bring up the issues of intimidation and harassment (when I was returned to work in 2007) at the arbitration hearing in December of 2008, I the man was objected to by you the private man Garry acting as union council and I was mooted by the arbitrator!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the reason you the private man Garry acting as unions council objected to me at the arbitration hearing was because you the private man Garry acting as the union council was aiding abating to conceal the union’s unlawful actions towards me! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you contend that these dilatory and negligent acts by the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president are deliberate and were often in concert with Dynatecs actions against me the man, which speaks to a conflict interest and criminal fraud. It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that this communication is to perfect a Agreement with you the private man that fraud if evident must and shall be investigated and It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that you presented with the fact of the fraud and taking no action admit to aiding and abetting criminal activity and conspiracy to commit fraud and that your liability bond via risk management is in serious jeopardy as of the unavoidable proof of intent to commit fraud!
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that because of numerous transgressions and misrepresentations and arbitrary discriminating behavior towards me the man the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president have brought great stress and anxiety upon me and my family by their intentional attempt to defraud me of my allot able monies and the unions blatant misrepresentation of me the man over the many years! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 shares full responsibility with Dynatec for failing to represent me and allowing the company to harass and discriminate against me the man again in 2007/2008! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that the private man Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890 misrepresentation of me the man has caused severe finical and emotional stress upon me the man and he along with Dynatecs onsite management team (now Procon) has poisoned my work environment with their arbitrary, discriminatory and punitive behavior toward me the man.
It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I the man have received a letter from Procon terminating my employment rights and seniority.
June 13, 2008 Phil Posom
Received my record of employment from dynatec this morning along with pay stub for vaction pay. It says that that business sold employee transferd to new company. Am I an emploee with Procron? I was never paid as a leader from Dynatec when I returned to work on september 4 2007 I was being paid at miners 2 rate. What is going on here? Please respond to all my concerns as this is causing me a enourmous amount of stress. I have spoken with Dr. Robertson this morning already. I await your response.I will fax over record of employment.
Bill June 19, 2008 Phoned Joan Duchek today to see where my forms for procron are. Joan Duchek informed me that I will not be hierd on by Procron. This is outrageous! Iam still an employee of Dynatec and should not have lost any senirotiy while I was reciveving benifits or while waiting for benifits. I phoned and left a message for Walter Manning, and Talked with Miles Hack union vice pres and told him that I want a grievence filed today! Was told by Miles this was the first he heard of it and that he would get back to me. I will let you know what happens when I hear something. brother Tim Debnam
June 19, 2008 Tim
Until Procon actually takes over the contract from Dynatec, there is no contractual obligation on their part. We are unable to file a grievance on this matter as of now. It appears from your email to Walter that Joan will be getting back to you after she has checked with her managers. Please let us know what her response is.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890
June 19, 2008 Walter
What is going on? Joan Duckek informed me that i would not be hired by procron! I asked why I was not being hired and she replied that she would have to speak with her managers. I informed her that I want the reason why in writing today! I was not a new hire when I returned to work on Sept 4, 2007. I should not have lost any seniority while I was in receipt of benefits or while waiting for benefits. This is causing me GREAT STRESS!!! We seem to have come to the bridge you referred to in your last email. What is my union prepared to do for me about these matters? Please get back to me today asap for Iam in need of answers!
Brbrother Tim Debnam
Hi Phil, as to date I have not received any correspondence from Pro-Con with respect to my employment with them at Mosaic. As I stated earlier Joan Duchek formally of Dynatec, but who is now employed by Pro-Con told me that "Pro-Con is not hiring you". As you had explained to me earlier Pro-Con did not have any contractual obligation to me till July 1st 2008. It seems possibly that my work place environment is poisoned would like to know if the union has had any correspondence with Pro-Con on this matter? Brother Tim Debnam
June 23 2008
Phil,
I contacted Joan Duchek of Procron today and was informed that Procron would not give me or put in writing the reason that they would not be hiring me. Joan also said that Procron is not hiring by seniority. Is this true? If I am not hired by Procron on the 30th of June 2008 will a grievance be filed on my behalf? Please get back to me on these issues.
Brother Tim Debnam
Hi Tim
They are to be hiring everyone and seniority as far as we are concerned will be recognized. If they do not hire you on we will deal with it. As far as the phone message regarding your RRSP plan you should be receiving a package from Dynatec shortly advising you as to what you are able to do with your RRSP’s.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890
Tim Debnam
Further to our discussions with you around the issues of being hired on by Procon we have raised the issue with them. The response we have gotten back from them is as follows. They are saying that you do not have a return to work form yet and that as soon as you are ready to return to work they will revisit your hiring. I will be discussing this with Walter as we have a couple other people off who they have said the same thing about. I will be in touch with you as soon as I get a response back from Walter.
Phil Polsom President CEP Local 890
It is privately understood ,agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that that because of the private men Phil Polsom acting as president for CEP local 890 and the private man Walter Manning acting as National Rep for CEP local 890, the private man Myles Hack acting as union vice president numerous transgressions against me the man that the CEP Local 890 union be obliged to pay out my union card as to what I would have made to retirement, this being 1.2 million dollars! It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that this request to you is to ensure full unedited disclosure because I have had it come to my attention that there is corruption that exists within the justice system. I don’t know which judges or prosecutors or officers of her majesty’s may be corrupt, so in deserving full defense, I am entitled to inquire as to the lawful oaths of allegiance these men and women may have that would by law give them the authority to act with her majesty’s sanction. It is privately understood, agreed, consented and accepted by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that if you fail to produce your lawful oaths of allegiance, you admit by default that you do not have a lawful oath of allegiance, are running de-facto, have no legitimate power what so ever and usurped her majesty’s power and sanction and have done so via fraud as the present oath of office act indicates in Saskatchewan that the Saskatchewan oath of allegiance is indeed deficient and is a violation of section 126 of the Canadian Criminal Code, which would indicate that the federal oaths of allegiance act is the act in question being violated.
It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that because of this I am requesting the full unedited disclosure with this case inclusive of and most specific to full unedited disclosure of what you submitted as evidence for me the man at the arbitration hearing in December 2008 A.D. and also any bonds, any investments any small business security issuing that has taken place on part of a provincial court in Saskatchewan that is trading on the New York stock exchange as indicated on Dunn and Brad street web site, where it is easily searched. The province of Saskatchewan brings up the provincial courts as trading entities. It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that I never gave consent and I need to know full disclosure as to who did give you consent and who is conducting this fraud without my permission? That is part of my full defense that I am entitled to and am requesting as such. It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that no one has any authority to intimidate a man or woman to do a thing they have religious freedom not to do like associating with the dead, allowing their name to be altered or a financial purpose, bowing to a provable false god or submitting to the provincial codes and rules of a dead in law legal fiction trading on the stock exchange as a business for profit in violation of God's command of Exodus 20:3-5 and Christs direction of Matthew 6:24 It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that my exercising of my faith may conflict with your monetary policies that in fact are not law but corporate rules so by this agreement I am ensuring no false assumptions or process may be engaged in obstructing me or intimidating me from having the ability to practice my faith harmless from reproach. So please get back to me with the information if you have it available, as if it is not lawful for me to follow the laws of God then I need to see by whose authority that I can be intimidated to break them. It is agreed by you the private man with no dispute to the fact that if you have no authority to intimidate me to violate Gods first commandment then you have no authority outside of Gods law as God's first commandment is “Do not bow to false Gods nor serve them”.
Blessings upon your expeditious reply if you have any law regulation court case or other authority that says you can tell me how to practice my faith or obstruct me form the official performance of the functions of my calling.
Blessings and sincerely questing for truth and a fair and amicable resolution for all.
Default notice
Offered under protest of threat duress and intimidation all freedoms in Gods law reserved non assumpsit without prejudice. minister-Timothy-Robert:Debnam
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home