Main articles - allcreatorsgifts.org

Free Peter Mack!!!
Letter to The Edmonton Police Service

*349-52246 Range Road 232*

*Sherwood Park, Alberta province*

*No code non commercial*

April 21, 2008

C/o*:* *The Edmonton Police Service*

9620 – 103 A Avenue

Edmonton, Alberta province

No code non commercial

*Without Prejudice*

*To: The private man, Alex Hasham, acting as Detective*

*Professional Standards Branch*

cc. the International Criminal Court of Law

The Hague

cc. The National Post

cc. PIHI

cc.The CBC

cc. 60 Minutes

cc. W5

cc. Reporters Internationally Based

cc. The Police Commission

cc. Internal Affairs

cc. Human Rights Commission Evaluation committees Police Review section

Dear Alex Hasham,

The letter and portfolio dated March 13, 2008, which I hand delivered to the
Chief off Police, Mike Boyd at the Edmonton Police Service at the above
address, was a bona fide complaint filed by me, regarding the unlawful
detention of senior citizen,

Peter Mack.

My complaint dealt only with the situation in which Peter Mack finds
himself, forcibly subjected to and that a remedy for his fraudulently
obtained unlawful incarceration is being sought.

The complaint filed against Constable Tipton was not filed by me but rather
is an inextricable part of the whole complaint and all issues regarding all
of the individuals that you have previously met with as a result of the
issues surrounding Mr. Peter Mack's case.

Again, you also asked that I represent the group, and therefore, there is an
inextricable complaint, if we are to be a group and a whole, rather than
individuals that you will respond to individually.

There were several doctors who had examined Peter Mack prior to his
kidnapping and unlawful incarceration and who offered their opinions of hear
say evidence and determined in their limited capacity that he was
incompetent.

*Doctor Taylor,* a respected and practicing physician registered with the
Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons, (known as the College of
Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, CPS), at Peter's request, attended
Rosedale-Griesbach Facility, along with

Dr. Cassandra Van Nostrand and minister Leon Brown. Dr. Carleton Taylor
performed a mental exam on Peter Mack on or about February 17, 2008, prior
to the church ceremony that all had planned to attend and did attend. He
(Dr. Carleton Taylor) at that time reached the professional conclusion that:

"*Any statement to the effect that Mr. Peter Mack, at the date of the exam I
performed on him, had serious mental problems, I would consider highly
suspect."*

Since the actions of the staff at the facility where Peter Mack is being
unlawfully held against his will, have been uncharacteristic and have
exerted exaggerated efforts towards segregating Peter Mack from visitors and
communicating with his friends and have indeed prevented him from even
receiving his mail, I believe the actions of February 17, 2008, have
provided even more indication of a fraud transpiring and a cover-up of the
attempts to gain control over Peter Mack's vast assets. There was even an
occasion in the last two months that Mr. Mack was wrongfully told that there
was no church service when there was indeed such a service and when they
knew or should have known of the service. Furthermore, these actions
constitute willful and intentional assistance to the illegal confinement of
Peter Mack and violations of his constitutional and charter rights and
freedoms without recourse to a method of legal checks and balances in the
province or in the system. The lack of these checks allows for the unlawful
conscription of seniors into facilities where they have less rights than
the mentally ill did in the years of the 50's and 60's when there were
rampant sterilizations of women in the Alberta Hospital system against their
will and against human rights of the confined in the hospital system. (Of
course this has resulted in multitudinous lawsuits against the government
for which the government has now paid out millions of dollars in damages.)

One of the doctors who evaluated Peter has even stated that dementia is
often characterized as Alzheimer's but can be treated. Peter Mack is
receiving no rehabilitating treatment and that the cruel and unusual
punishment of segregation from his friends and supporters, stealing his
address book, and keeping him confined against his will is a violation of
his rights and freedoms.

It is not news that an ever increasing percentage of the elderly in this
country means there are billions of dollars sitting elderly citizens' bank
accounts…. It is no secret that families, lawyers and courts alike conspire
on how to transfer control of the money to the children or the courts who
can use the funds to act as a surety for small business security issues in
the form of pledged bonds.

This is not the justice system we are told exists…Peter Mack never did
receive a fair hearing and was deliberately prevented from speaking in his
own defense….Can you as an investigator of crime lawfully ignore information
that points to a conspiracy to deprive a man of his property and freedom and
still be honorably performing your duty?

Is not a man's right to speak at his own competency hearing, part of the
rights guaranteed to all her Majesty's subjects?

Is not failing to perform your duty thereby endangering one's comfort, an
offense under 180 of the criminal code? Is not the capacity to ensure one's
comfort to exercise all rights defended by her majesty, in danger as a
result of not performing your duty to defend those rights? Is it not an
offense to intimidate someone to prevent them from doing a thing they have a
right to do like associate with and call whom he wishes or visit whomever
when the occasion calls?

Peter Mack has never had consistent or permanent evidence he was threat to
himself or others corroborated and he was with no explanation categorically
denied ability to speak for himself…..He now has two Members of the Alberta
College of Physicians and Surgeons, one in active practice who performed the
mental exam, and the other who is retired, speaking up on his behalf and
making professional observations that Peter Mack's diagnosis as being senile
or having Alzheimer's was premature and an inaccurate diagnosis that is not
presently observable…Surely the benefit of the doubt goes to the one
sentient man claiming fraud and kidnapping...not to the financially
motivated perpetrators.

Since my concern rests with the unfair, unjust treatment and unlawful
incarceration of Peter Mack, I am assisting him in my official ministerial
capacity to help him find an honorable remedy to this situation. It is my
hope that you, in performing your duty to defend his comfort, will aid me in
the official performance of the functions of my calling in this serious
matter of intimidation, kidnapping, unlawful confinement and fraud in order
to invoke an investigation.

*I am doing this at his request and on his behalf within my ecclesiastical
authority indicated in 176 of the criminal code.*

*Blessings upon your serious attention being applied to this highly
suspicious case of senior abuse and fraud!*

The investigation into the unprovoked assault of Minister Leon Brown, by the
administrator of the facility where Peter Mack is being held prisoner, will
not doubt reveal some interesting facts as she tries to explain why Peter, a
sentient and lucid thinking man is being prevented from having guests or
consenting to having a mental exam. The doctor who performed the exam,
Carleton Taylor, is of the professional opinion that Peter Mack was
responsive, had a good grasp on what was happening, explained himself well,
and was not indicating any evident mental problems or that he represented a
threat to himself or anyone else at the time of his exam.

As we all approach those years when we may be in need of care, it is my hope
that your consciousness about who has the authority to prevent you from
speaking at your own hearing and to ensure that a jury of your peers
deciding over the actions of bribed and drug pushing doctors is assembled at
a lawful trial…

This looks just like legalized theft with the doctors and judges conspiring
with the lawyers in order to gain control over the funds…The court has
control over Peter Mack's massive funds upon the hearsay evidence of a few
doctors…The court house is a small business security issuer as all paper
going through the courts are contracts. The motive to gain control over
Peter's vast wealth is an obvious factor in determining if Peter's
incarceration is a result of a conspiracy and fabricated evidence. Peter
Mack deserves the benefit of the doubt and was not afforded that right by
preventing him from speaking. He was literally and deliberately prevented
from speaking to enable the theft of his millions.

Bribery is nothing new and with the amount of funds Peter 's estate has,
those collecting on the seizure as a result of his kidnapping and unlawful
confinement would have no problem paying those who helped incarcerate Peter
to enable it to happen.

In my humble opinion that is conspiracy to fraud and theft!!

It is my sincerest wish for you to provide aid to you in investigating this
suspicious activity concerning Peter Mack's *kidnapping.*

Section II

Of course you are aware of the fact that Officer Tipton did, in fact, fail
to investigate the two material witnesses, i.e. both professional doctors
and both trained in injuries and in fact one of them also trained in law,
that were available to the officer but that were not approached to give
information pertaining to the assault on Leon Brown who was so intimidated,
so hurt and so hassled that he initially did not even give a verbal report
of the injury that he suffered and that was visible to the parties all there
present. So there is an air apparent that the policeman, Mr. Tipton did, in
fact, choose to selectively believe one person, i.e. the Nurse that she did
not cause an injury while choosing to assault minister Brown. It appears
constable Tipton chose to:

*selectively… to believe that the disabled minister could not have been
injured as indeed minister Brown was ,and to selectively chose not to
investigate or ask questions of Dr. Van Nostrand and or Dr. Taylor, who both
witnessesd the crime, concerning the actions of the Administrator/nurse in
causing the injury, assault, and unlawful and obstruction of minister Leon
Brown.*

It is also my opinion that Mr. Tipton chose not to file a complaint of

1. mischief as against the perpetrators of the falsehood that caused the
police to come to the building in the first place which he should have so
done

2. That Mr. Tipton did not investigate the complaint of the obstruction
of the minister, i.e. of Leon Brown in doing his ministerial and church
functions and or duties, and that this was in itself a separate and legal
violation of the CCC 176 and that this was printed on the form of the
complaint and the label that Mr. Tipton did see, and that once again, he
selectively chose to ignore the complaint as such and to not do anything as
against the person(s) of Rosedale-Griesbach Facility and that he was
deficient in his duty and that he was discriminating as against Leon Brown
as such.

Thus the filing of the complaint should still stand and investigation should
not be dropped. Per se.

Sincerely offered in performing the official function and calling of my
capacity as a minister of Jesus Christ.

Teresa M. Hufnagl

Reference:

D.N. v. Switzerland

No. 27154 / 95

Home